Arsenal FC transfer budget to be cut ‘because of property market slowdown’
I write this a few minutes after the end of Arsenal’s last home match of the 07-08 season, as they do a lap of the ground to thank we who have supported through a season that showed incredible promise to the surprise of all, but fell at the final hurdle after a string of unfortunate refereeing decisions, injuries, and lapses of concentration.
Among the players doing the lap are three or four likely summer departures - excellent players whom we could not satisfy the wage demands of because strict adherence by the management to what some argue is an overly restrictive wage structure. So it really frustrates me to read in the Times today that
the transfer budget had to be cut back because of the slowdown in the property market, which is expected to affect the sales of flats both at the club’s former Highbury ground and in the new developments at the Emirates Stadium.
Much like the fears of a recession that swept the US, with early signs of those fears abating (Intrade.com just swung the expectation of a US recession from 70% likelihood to 30%), Britain is in the grips of fears of a property crash. I refuse to share those fears (perhaps the foolishness of youth), so it grates me that these fears will compromise our ability to replace two or perhaps even more key components of our squad.
Here’s why I don’t believe in the property crash in the short term (though there’s a great visualisation of why we should expect a crash at some point - well worth watching here). London is growing at a staggering rate. To keep pace with its growth without doing away with the green belt, the average population and housing density of Greater London will have to grow by an astounding 60% over the next decade. Unless Britain’s economy stagnates and job stability is significantly affected - which nobody so far is expecting - this can only translate into increased demand, at least in the London area. Furthermore, I share LSE economist Tim Leunig’s opinion that we can expect a 5-10% dip over the next year but an overall rise in the next 5. I’ll summarise the main points he outlines in this month’s Prospect:
Reasons for the dip:
- The credit crunch has hit mortgage availability and raised interest rates
- Change in capital gains rules means buy-to-let owners have a greater incentive to sell out
- There are signs of the influx of Eastern Europeans may be reversing and they may be heading home, selling their houses as they go
- Supply has so far been ensured by a lot of studio flat construction, but that these are not good places to live and soon a wave of recent owners will seek to sell (this sounds dodgy to me)
On the other hand:
- In response to (1) above, HSBC is already snapping up mortgages, or the bank of England seems prepared to provide liquidity by taking on some of the better mortgages as collateral
- Underlying strength in the economy will limit how punitive mortgage rates get over the next year
- This same strength will keep unemployment down meaning more properties out of the market
- Britain continues to build fewer homes than the number of households is growing. This key supply & demand balance, unless households start emigrating (which is unlikely with prospects of a Conservative government just around the corner) is perhaps the most promising indicator.
This outcome, of course, is terrible news for someone such as myself that’s not even on the property ladder. If I’m reasonable, I should bust a gut in the next 24 months to earn enough to at least buy something, even a shack out in the Tower Hamlets, in the dip before the rise… unlikely though. I may well just end up abroad, or renting for the medium term. As for Arsenal, well - to cut the transfer budget by anything in excess of 5%, with the property market as the only reason, would really, really rile me.
Related:
- Matt Mason, The Pirate’s Dilemma
- In the video above, Matt Mason explains the value of piracy to a bunch of trad media suits. He credits pirate radio as a crucible for new music trends and as breaking grounds for new music DJs - an important counterpoint to commercial radio stations like Kiss 100 and Capital FM (in London). I don't disagree with Matt about the importance of pirate radio. Kiss was once a pirate radio station. But he misses the point - innovation isn't an inherent property of music piracy. Case in point - new bands aspire for airplay on (BBC) Radio 1, not your local pirate radio - because Radio 1 launches talent, not piracy. Matt gives piracy too much credit, missing the broader force that piracy is a part of - nonmarket production. Like pirate radio, BBC Radio 1 isn't market-motivated. THAT'S why it can take risks on underground talent, new music forms (future trends, or not - they don't care). Publicly-owned services, the pirate underground, nonprofits and transient crowd 'flashmob' initiatives are not driven by the same motivations as Kiss and Capital - and that's where the benefit to society lies. Matt's defence of piracy is flawed in that it speaks...
- Backyard boffins beating Europe’s biggest
- Spectre's put together a great set of articles about Surrey Satellite Technology ltd. (SSTL). Get this, from a 2005 article: "A company formed by a small team of boffins in Guildford yesterday launched the first Galileo satellite, beating a rival consortium of three of Europe's technology giants [Alcatel, EADS and Thales]. "SSTL expects to have a turnover of £30m this year, with pre-tax profits of around £1.5m. The company has grown by 25pc a year since it was spun out of Surrey University in 1985. The consortium, Galileo Industries, originally tendered at five times the price quoted by SSTL, but their satellite is still in testing and not expected to launch until mid-2006." "We specifically make low-cost and quick satellites," he said. Giove-A, which weighs 600kg, has gone from drawing board to launch in 30 months. "We take these components out of iPods and so on, and work out whether we can fly them in our spacecraft." Sir Martin said conventional components can take up to 15 years to test, by which time they may be obsolete. "Imagine if you bought a PC that was 15 years old." The best thing about this: Surrey University owns 80% of the company...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Add New Comment
Viewing 3 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)