What does a ‘Forward’ email button do to society?
- What happens if I didn’t have a cc button, a bcc button, a Forward button?
- What happens if I didn’t have “attach document, attach spreadsheet, attach presentation” buttons?
- What happens if I did have “attach link, attach video, attach audio” buttons, much like Facebook?
These features all arose from a very obvious demand/need, so perhaps it’s pedantry to ask “what if”. But as a thought exercise, these are outstandingly incisive questions pertaining to the nature of 21st-century comms - with huge ramifications. What would be the implications for collaboration (work, organising your social life), cross-fertilisation of ideas, intelligence and mastery of concepts and finding the words to express them, if email had never had a Forward button? What is ‘attach video’ or ‘attach link’ doing to our culture and our media (viral media springs to mind, but what are the deeper ramifications)? What about communication, decision making and innovation in the workplace (by forwarding, do we encourage groupthink)?
And although these very obvious features to introduce, what isn’t so obvious is when to exclude them. JP (confused of calcutta) makes the salient point that actually, on the daddy of all social networks, Facebook, there ISN’T a ‘forward this message’ option. It had never occurred to me, but thinking about it, it’s potentially protecting my fb inbox from a huge volume of tosh, chain mail, etc. Its omission makes facebook messaging a cleaner, more useful comm tool, one I pay more attention to.
I’m going to try and cut down on simple forwarding and linking - both to improve the usefulness of my communication, but also because nobody ever learned the contents of a document by photocopying - you learn your lecture notes by processing them (into essays, abridged notes, etc) - so there’s a benefit to my contacts, and to myself.
In the age of Information Smog and the Attention Economy, knowing when NOT to forward/link is a valuable and important skill.
Related:
- Twitter
- So ashamed at myself. After resisting the mass hysteria surrounding Twitter, I finally succumbed and signed up. Here's the post mortem: Met Biz Stone, the creator, last year. Nice guy, pretty interesting. For a while, news has been breaking first through Twitter, and events are covered live this way. I'm a very DIY guy. I like to get to the bottom of things, and find things out as directly from the source as possible. If I can avoid extraneous layers of coverage and processing, like TechCrunch, so much the better I like aggregating what's being said into a single field. It creates unique contexts that, whilst usually serve no purpose (perhaps even obfuscate the meaning of a piece of information), sometimes, it can magically bring a whole new context and meaning to data. I wish my email, Twitter, Facebook friend feed, and what interesting Twits have to say, were all aggregated (as long as the tool was clever in helping me spend my 'attention credits'. For a while, I've been thinking. So many people use it to communicate, it must be a decent communication tool. It looks as though it's going to develop into a better mode of communication, and...
- What’s to come: the future of social media consumption
- With broadband penetration (and capacity) increasing, and music devices increasingly connected to WiFi (iPod Touch, iPhone) or to 3G (Nokia's big music push; laptops), the general consensus is that the future lies in media streaming, not the traditional stored music collections (be it shelves of LPs, stacks of CDs and DVDs, or hard drives full of mp3s and DiVX). A few years from now, you and all your friends will be consuming music online, on demand, from a myriad of different sources. If you use Mozilla Songbird, you can already pull in all the music posted on music blogs and Hype Machine into an iTunes-like virtual music library. Even more than infinite diversity of on demand music, the killer app for free (probably ad-supported) streaming media is that anyone can access it from anywhere in the world - they just need a link to it (unlike the mp3's on your iPod). That's the simple little thing that suggests we're in for a REVOLUTION in the way we consume and discover music. The logic is simple: Someone will setup a service which, when you stream music or a video anywhere on the web, will alert all your friends (that have signed...
- Seesmic buys a Twitter client: a big step for desktop micro-broadcasting
- So, overhyped social tool Seesmic has acquired the popular Twitter client, Twhirl. Desktop clients, have been an important part of its success, it's far less compelling to load up Twitter.com all the time. I hope Seesmic didn't pay much for Twirl: only so much as it would cost them to develop it in house, and not a cent more. Mainly that's because there are loads of Twitter clients out there, many very good, and the barriers to switching are largely nonexistent - in fact, alternative clients are advertised right within Twhirl (see right >>), powerful advertising since it's an implicit recommendation from your contacts. At least they get a good Adobe AIR coder, and some cross-selling opportunities to Twhirl users. Media for a long time pre-Internet was consolidated in the hands of huge, singular broadcasters like the BBC, TimeWarner, newspapers, radio stations. Now, members of the public can broadcast themselves (I won't pass judgement here as to whether that's particularly valuable to society... the techno-utopian says yes, the techno-cynic says no) When I post short blocks of text to Twitter, short posts on my blog, a quick video to YouTube, etc, I'm broadcasting myself in micro-format compared to the...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Add New Comment
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)