How feasibly can we actually drop our global CO2 production?
I hate talking about global warming – its boring, cliche, and largely depressing, because any careful thinking about it invariably leads to the conclusion that the only true solution, if climate change models based on CO2 are correct, is a mass human extinction event, or exodus (to other planets); your child is a much greater environmental nightmare than your Hummer H2 is.
If our primary objective as a species is a global reduction in happiness and development inequalities, allowing global population growth to continue apace is totally counterproductive. And that’s a sad thought, and one that may motivate a global terrorism movement far worse than Al Qaeda.
But take a look at this graph (source: McKinsey). It estimates the cost and effectiveness of the various proposed things society can do to bring emissions down. On the left, the negative y axis values show that we save a lot of money and abate CO2 emissions, with certain strategies like insulating our houses and offices. To the right, expensive strategies. It’s clear from the graph that the real gains to be made (measured as progress along the x axis) are in this economically costly zone.
The worst part: even with all known strategies pursued, we still hit the dangerously (*according to current climate models) high levels of 450ppm by 2030.
I’d like to be able to play with the graph and generate data based on different population and oil price forecasts. Their assumptions aren’t clearly stated, disappointingly. This link offers a modest amount of skepticism regarding this graph, and highlights some further insights it gives us, alongside some auxiliary information about the bang-for-buck of different climate change prevention schemes.
Related:
- Your food has… software?!
- Thought for the day: the genome of a cell is its software. “Mad” scientists like CJ. Venter are already finding out how to ‘install linux’ on bacterial ‘hardware’ by swapping out its own chromosome with that of another bacteria, or even a man-made chromosome. And for some time now we have been editing the software [...]...
- Facebook is Irish! (let the fun begin)
- I am on a very geeky mission: to use the Data Protection Act to tell me exactly what information is used and processed about me. Thanks to a great spot by a Twitter contact, a breakthrough came yesterday: Facebook is an Irish company (for anyone not in the USA), so falls under all the juicy EU pro-consumer law (and Irish laws to boot). Things have just got interesting - read on:...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.