Over The Counter Culture

Staring at the sun
Latest Posts »
Popular »
» Rule of law, Rule of sponsors
» Jabulani Justice
» The Anti-wisdom of the Crowd: tourists
» The Facebook Data Protection Act letter
» Adam Curtis Greencine interview on media elitism, the US and the UK
» Last.fm is becoming a great big clever iTunes in the sky
» Open conversation online pays off
» Arsenal FC transfer budget to be cut ‘because of property market slowdown’
« Football managers getting sanctioned by the FA for speaking out against refs
Seesmic buys a Twitter client: a big step for desktop micro-broadcasting »

iPlayer; licence fee subsidies

The ISP industry sez: People use the iPlayer <>. The iPlayer has massively boosted the average Internet consumption of those people as they watch more video than ever<>. This is costing ISPs money <>. If the BBC doesn’t give the ISPs the money to match this marginal cost, or BT doesn’t reduce the cost of renting extra copper pipes from them, their margins will go down <>. This means they have to pass the cost onto the end user, you and me. Ashley Highfield, at the BBC, slaps their outstretched hand<>, but others at the BBC suggest a BBC-sponsored hardware rollout to help the ISPs cope<>.

If the cost is passed onto the end user, i.e. my ISP fee every month goes up, as a result of a project I have already paid for by my annual TV license, isn’t BT costing me money once for the license, and then every month for providing the iPlayer to the UK population, whether I personally use it or not?

Is this double-taxing for the iPlayer fair (irrespective of whether I use it)? What’s the solution?

PS: the ISP’s claims are logical (if undeserving of pity, given they chose to build themselves on the ‘all you can eat’ model that they are now being buggered by), but what should one make of the fact that PlusNet, from which the ISP outcries originally stemmed, and on whose data a lot of press coverage and models are being based, is owned by BT?

Nothing, given the OFCOM-mandated ‘chinese wall’ between BT’s ISP business and its wholesale pipe rental? Surprise that it be the first to complain, given that complaint invites enquiry into BT Wholesale/Openreach’s pricing policies? Suspicion, that BT wants the government to divert BBC money either to its ISP clients, to protect its own margins by silencing demands for reduced wholesale prices, or to BT directly, for the construction of its 21stCenturyNetwork, which would boost available bandwidth and thus help ISPs deal with the explosion of content/iPlayer consumption? Or something else?

Bookmark/Share:

Related:

The Big Bang (of OTCC)
No point in mincing words. The industry's being turned on it's head. This is a revolution. Whereas the music industry used to operate on a push model, it looks as though it's becoming a pull economy - where the user goes out and selects the music he is exposed to, and the music he eventually spends money on....
Future trends in philanthropy: targeted donation, wikicharity
I was browsing around WikiLeaks (a site’s that’s been in the news a lot recently – it collects whistleblower evidence and exposes it to the world; like WikiPedia, it’s collectively and openly administered and edited) for JPMorgan/Bear Sterns content. Not much there so far, except this clever investment vehicle JP Morgan has invented to allow [...]...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 3rd, 2008 at 12:59 pm and is filed under Musings. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

blog comments powered by Disqus
  • Home
  • About
  • List all posts
  • Current Reading
  • Search

Over The Counter Culture is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).