iPlayer; licence fee subsidies
The ISP industry sez: People use the iPlayer <>. The iPlayer has massively boosted the average Internet consumption of those people as they watch more video than ever<>. This is costing ISPs money <>. If the BBC doesn’t give the ISPs the money to match this marginal cost, or BT doesn’t reduce the cost of renting extra copper pipes from them, their margins will go down <>. This means they have to pass the cost onto the end user, you and me. Ashley Highfield, at the BBC, slaps their outstretched hand<>, but others at the BBC suggest a BBC-sponsored hardware rollout to help the ISPs cope<>.
If the cost is passed onto the end user, i.e. my ISP fee every month goes up, as a result of a project I have already paid for by my annual TV license, isn’t BT costing me money once for the license, and then every month for providing the iPlayer to the UK population, whether I personally use it or not?
Is this double-taxing for the iPlayer fair (irrespective of whether I use it)? What’s the solution?
PS: the ISP’s claims are logical (if undeserving of pity, given they chose to build themselves on the ‘all you can eat’ model that they are now being buggered by), but what should one make of the fact that PlusNet, from which the ISP outcries originally stemmed, and on whose data a lot of press coverage and models are being based, is owned by BT?
Nothing, given the OFCOM-mandated ‘chinese wall’ between BT’s ISP business and its wholesale pipe rental? Surprise that it be the first to complain, given that complaint invites enquiry into BT Wholesale/Openreach’s pricing policies? Suspicion, that BT wants the government to divert BBC money either to its ISP clients, to protect its own margins by silencing demands for reduced wholesale prices, or to BT directly, for the construction of its 21stCenturyNetwork, which would boost available bandwidth and thus help ISPs deal with the explosion of content/iPlayer consumption? Or something else?
Related:
- Future trends in philanthropy: targeted donation, wikicharity
- I was browsing around WikiLeaks (a site's that's been in the news a lot recently - it collects whistleblower evidence and exposes it to the world; like WikiPedia, it's collectively and openly administered and edited) for JPMorgan/Bear Sterns content. Not much there so far, except this clever investment vehicle JP Morgan has invented to allow insider trading. Sucks to be you, external stakeholder. Anyhow. What interested me was their 'business model' (it's not-for-profit, to be clear). When whistleblowers submit evidence of evil, that goes up for all to see. Wikileaks takes charge of taking that, doing additional background research on the story, and writing it up as a press release (the JPMorgan insider trading write-up can be seen here). It's an important step in a day when newsrooms are increasingly under pressure to survive (and thus to get to stories as quickly and efficiently as possible). But it costs money. The business model is this: 'targeted donation' requests on the leaked documents page. Rather than generally be a supporter of wikileaks, I enable/provide direction to its work by restricting my donation to particular issues I care about (the 'Sudan Appeal' type of charity function, writ large, writ standard). I see...
- Should new media actually try to compete with piracy?
- Spoke to some interesting people at the ContentNext mixer earlier tonight. Of particular interest were some guys from the film distribution industry, not just because it's something I did some strategy work on in 2007, but because these are the guys (LOVEFiLM et al) that are really suffering from media piracy, no matter what they do (despite this, Amazon is reportedly taking a very strong interest in the aforementioned company). They're stuck between pirates who refuse to pay for content, and film studios (publishers) that are used to scarcity selling (shifting low units relative to what could potentially be achieved with the Internet as a distribution network, at high margins) and refuse to drop wholesale prices to LOVEFiLM etc. The emergent call from the anti-RIAA crowd (Andrew Orlowski of The Register calls them, or us rather, "freetards") is 'don't punish, compete!' But a moment's reflection suggests that that may be a fool's errand. Firstly, how on earth do you compete with the following: Free! Huge catalogs of content on demand - every rarity Available in the format you want (or the open source/freeware tools to convert it) - e.g. losssless audio (FLAC) Leaked content available before it hits cinemas...
- WTF-of-the-day
- http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ec69619a-f8f9-11dc-bcf3-000077b07658.html The Zimbabwe government under President Robert Mugabe has embarked on a borrowing and spending spree ahead of Saturday’s presidential and parliamentary elections. In the six weeks to March 7, government debt increased 65-fold from Z$25,000bn to Z$1,600,000bn (£26bn, US$53bn, €34bn), according to official figures. While the increase in government expenditure is exaggerated by inflation, running at a rate of at least 150 per cent a month, the surge in borrowing – more than half of it by overdraft from the central bank – can be considered a direct measure of the ruling Zanu-PF party’s desperation to secure Mr Mugabe’s re-election. Central bank officials say that Z$166,000bn was spent to increase salaries of public servants, especially teachers and security force personnel. Another Z$500,000bn went on buying farm equipment, according to central bank officials. There have been reports that Zanu-PF is also distributing industrial and commercial machinery. The spending is intended to counter what opposition parties say is a big swing against Mr Mugabe in the countryside, traditionally the bedrock of his support. Election observers from the Southern African Development Community have rejected suggestions that the electoral process is unfair. What the fuck: Why are the Zimbabwean people tolerating this?...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Add New Comment
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks