Over The Counter Culture

Roll your own
Latest Posts »
Popular »
» Microphilanthropy is to traditional charity what dual core processors are to single-core processors
» Paradoxical lifestyles
» Backyard boffins beating Europe’s biggest
» Manifesto for Microphilanthropy
» Google Friend Connect - part 2: The largest Social Network ever built
» Social networking dividend of open conversations
» Conversation platforms will make blogs redundant
» Arsenal FC transfer budget to be cut ‘because of property market slowdown’
« Football managers getting sanctioned by the FA for speaking out against refs
Seesmic buys a Twitter client: a big step for desktop micro-broadcasting »

iPlayer; licence fee subsidies

The ISP industry sez: People use the iPlayer <>. The iPlayer has massively boosted the average Internet consumption of those people as they watch more video than ever<>. This is costing ISPs money <>. If the BBC doesn’t give the ISPs the money to match this marginal cost, or BT doesn’t reduce the cost of renting extra copper pipes from them, their margins will go down <>. This means they have to pass the cost onto the end user, you and me. Ashley Highfield, at the BBC, slaps their outstretched hand<>, but others at the BBC suggest a BBC-sponsored hardware rollout to help the ISPs cope<>.

If the cost is passed onto the end user, i.e. my ISP fee every month goes up, as a result of a project I have already paid for by my annual TV license, isn’t BT costing me money once for the license, and then every month for providing the iPlayer to the UK population, whether I personally use it or not?

Is this double-taxing for the iPlayer fair (irrespective of whether I use it)? What’s the solution?

PS: the ISP’s claims are logical (if undeserving of pity, given they chose to build themselves on the ‘all you can eat’ model that they are now being buggered by), but what should one make of the fact that PlusNet, from which the ISP outcries originally stemmed, and on whose data a lot of press coverage and models are being based, is owned by BT?

Nothing, given the OFCOM-mandated ‘chinese wall’ between BT’s ISP business and its wholesale pipe rental? Surprise that it be the first to complain, given that complaint invites enquiry into BT Wholesale/Openreach’s pricing policies? Suspicion, that BT wants the government to divert BBC money either to its ISP clients, to protect its own margins by silencing demands for reduced wholesale prices, or to BT directly, for the construction of its 21stCenturyNetwork, which would boost available bandwidth and thus help ISPs deal with the explosion of content/iPlayer consumption? Or something else?

Bookmark/Share:

Related:

Twitter change
Nota bene: Change of address: http://twitter.com/flipbrad If you would rather not receive posts from this blog's 'Lifestream' category (such as this one) to your RSS reader, you can access the...

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 3rd, 2008 at 12:59 pm and is filed under Musings. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

discussion by DISQUS
Add New Comment
Go to Forum —  Track Comments —  Comments RSS
  • Home
  • About
  • List all posts
  • Categories
    • Culture bucket
    • Lifestream
    • Musings
    • New science
  • Search

Over The Counter Culture is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).