Over The Counter Culture

Staring at the sun
Latest Posts »
Popular »
» Heating your home with a wood-fired boiler
» Lambeth Council to spin out services as co-ops
» The co-op
» On the Happiness of the Fat and the Bereaved
» Adam Curtis Greencine interview on media elitism, the US and the UK
» Last.fm is becoming a great big clever iTunes in the sky
» Open conversation online pays off
» Arsenal FC transfer budget to be cut ‘because of property market slowdown’
« Eliza Doolittle
Backyard boffins beating Europe’s biggest »

Manifesto for Microphilanthropy

Microphilanthropy is the Next Big Thing. It’ll be a child of the Age of Choice – the same way humans no longer tune into a channel an Watch What Is On, but instead flick through the hundreds of channels the AoC has made available to them (or, pushing it to an AoC extreme, go to Youtube and search for their entertainment – i.e. micro-personalises his/her experience). No longer will mass campaigns, focused at the head of the curve, be the dominant force in philanthropy – the Long Tail phenomenon that has revolutionised industries like bookselling, electronics retailing, publishing, music, the arts, TV, etc, will also hit charity.

We will see a move from charities and foundations as monolithic armies of street teams and envelope lickers on the donor side, and reasonably large and static deployments of Western expat “missionary” forces on the ground, receiver side – to an entirely new model for charitable institutions, much more like a telephone exchange of old – operators, there to connect you to the ground level, to the cause you care passionately about – even though nobody else in your social circle, neighbourhood or even city cares about it. The Internet will bring enough ‘freaks’ like you together to make the world move in that specific, totally unique way that resonates so strongly with you). The ground level will need to be mobile and flexible and able to react to spontaneous coming-together of interest groups – taken to an extreme, that is a concept I call ’smartmob philanthropy’ and to be totally flexible and responsive on the ground level, it’s going to need Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” of the markets. But that’s not my focus today. I’m looking donor-side.

Future charities will need to make themselves as transparent and connective as they possibly can – a no bullshit, no interruptions, constant connection with your cause. Keep the pipeline up, and they can get more dollars flowing from your bank account than a mass media, totally untargeted mailout, TV spot or street ‘attack’ could ever have. You, as a donor, have so much more than just money to offer, if you can be connected with causes you care about. You can become its greatest advocate in your social circle, far more persuasive and actionable than some well-meaning spotty teenager in a fluorescent bib with a clipboard and a nametag could ever be. You can also be a source of inspiration, networking and innovation to those on the ground level receiving your passionate support.

The Internet is the key technology. My generation, unlike that of my parents, has grown up totally native and accustomed to the Age of Choice – we go to iTunes and we download the music that resonates intimately with us – mainstream radio bores us. The AoC is an unstoppable force – every message, every experience – marketing, entertainment, retail, google ads – trend towards becoming ever more tailored, customised. Charity can’t stick to standard, mass broadcast modes. With the internet, it has infinite gallery space and a rich framework for recommendation tools – old charity is stuck in the mentality of mailing out 3 page pamphlets in which it can only hold one story, aimed at tugging the heartstrings of an entire population – and FORCING the message through with the spotty clipboard brigade or other rude and aggressive moves like including a pen with the mailed-out  pamphlet.

Time for a change.

[I suppose the only reason philanthropy is so far behind every other Internet-revolutionised industry is the lack of market forces - it's damn hard enough getting a dollar out of you, let alone competing for it against other charities. That'll change.]

Bookmark/Share:

Related:

The paradox of being good
Via TrueSlant/Neuroworld: You may remember from the other day, the Al Gore’s Giant Fraggin’ Mansion Effect. Or, as it’s alternately known, moral self-regulation. This is a concept where people who are satisfied that they are “good,” will act bad. People primed to think positive thoughts about themselves will give less to charity; perhaps those pleased with their [...]...
BNP disgraced by the Royal British Legion
A heartening open letter to Nick Griffin from the Royal British Legion, a charity supporting veterans of Britain’s wars – the defenders of British shores and ideals, a calling the BNP would very much like to believe it also fights for. Just skimming the letter, you can hear the sound of a satisfyingly huge slap ring out across the internet: (...more)...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 9th, 2008 at 11:45 pm and is filed under Musings. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  • jennifer gree
    http://www.changingthepresent.org is a non profit website with micro- philanthropic gift ideas for the holiday season
  • gregorylent
    smartmob philanthropy and micro-niches .... combined with micropayment is a probable future for artists, musicians, bloggers ... instead of a few making a lot of money and the rest not, a lot of people making some money, via a kind of micropayment/subscription technology

    in america i pay for a newspaper just to read the comic strip doonesbury, and would happily send that 50 cents to the artist, the heck with the paper

    increasing transparency, reducing overhead, getting paid for being who you are ....

    (and i think charities are far behind for the same reason anybody is behind, a vested interest in avoiding change in order to maintain what works)
  • Philippe Bradley
    Pure commoditisation - which ultimately, is what needs micropayment - is almost the exact opposite of microphilanthropy! It leads to donation requests getting so micro as to make the donation they ask for so small that potential donors can't be bothered to do it - it's too much effort to get your wallet out, type in the card details, etc (hence the need for micropayment systems to get over this).

    Microphilanthropy is not (in my eyes) the act of commoditising charity into tiny, massmarketed, micropayment experiences (i.e. micro-donations by millions of people) - it's about fostering a Long Tail in our new hyperconnected world. The micro relates more to the size of the niche - specific families, specific stories - than to the size of the donation. Micro-donation is an alternative model for charity perhaps more suited to the existing, highly institutionalised model of philanthropy (but could be very important/useful to it, so also requires discussion)

    There's no reason why average donations can't stay relatively upscale in microphilanthropy - it is based around the creation/display of hyper-personal, highly niche charitable actions, thus it finds unusually devoted people (because it's highly personal, it should be of high value to people, hence the large donations), and it finds enough of them to put together a group just large enough to make the world move in that tiny niche. Before the internet, it was too hard to find those people, so charities had to stick to mass-appeal issues, staying very general. Since everyone is different, millions of niches get worked on, all in parallel. Microphilanthropy is a hyper-parallelised model of charity - its a similar boost that you get from a dual-core processor (parallel computing) versus single-core.
  • crosbie
    I prefer the term micropatronage. This isn't a donation in support of a favoured cause, but a commission contingent upon the production of art.

    That's what I'm working on anyway, a mechanism to enable people to reward artists for their art rather than publishers for producing copies. I call it the contingencymarket.com - commission similarly voluntary.
  • gregorylent
    i think what you are saying is that with microphilanthropy i could start a charity for the five village women in my neighborhood who have alcoholic husbands and no food for the kinds, small targets ...

    sometimes i have trouble with academic language, and i apologize for my lack of clarity ...

    micro transactions of any sort seem to be in our future, through mechanisms as yet uninvented, it seems
blog comments powered by Disqus
  • Home
  • About
  • List all posts
  • Current Reading
  • Search

Over The Counter Culture is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).