Matt Mason, The Pirate’s Dilemma
In the video above, Matt Mason explains the value of piracy to a bunch of trad media suits. He credits pirate radio as a crucible for new music trends and as breaking grounds for new music DJs - an important counterpoint to commercial radio stations like Kiss 100 and Capital FM (in London). I don’t disagree with Matt about the importance of pirate radio. Kiss was once a pirate radio station. But he misses the point - innovation isn’t an inherent property of music piracy. Case in point - new bands aspire for airplay on (BBC) Radio 1, not your local pirate radio - because Radio 1 launches talent, not piracy.
Matt gives piracy too much credit, missing the broader force that piracy is a part of - nonmarket production. Like pirate radio, BBC Radio 1 isn’t market-motivated. THAT’S why it can take risks on underground talent, new music forms (future trends, or not - they don’t care). Publicly-owned services, the pirate underground, nonprofits and transient crowd ‘flashmob’ initiatives are not driven by the same motivations as Kiss and Capital - and that’s where the benefit to society lies. Matt’s defence of piracy is flawed in that it speaks of piracy as a unique mode of creativity and innovation; it isn’t, he’s just chosen to ignore the wider context it lies in. I think he does realise this, lumping Linux etc in with piracy. In which case, it’s disingenuous to fly the Skull & Crossbones; it’s only going to tarnish the reputation of legit nonmarket forms of production.
But he’s spot on with his other points - piracy creates value in society by highlighting that something’s not right with your business model. Piracy keeps you on your toes (forcing you to seek out increased efficiency).
I think Matt’s first argument needs to be adjusted. Piracy supplies you with new ideas BUT only moreso than other forms of nonmarket production when the raw materials HAVE to be ripped off, usually because they’re commercial goods that are overpriced & unaffordable for the public sector, mobs or nonprofit orgs. Hence mp3 blogs operated illegally (before their marketing value was realised by capitalism) because only label (copyrightedO) music was available and in demand by Googlers. Now, mp3 blogs are a major new media marketing channel for labels. Piracy is only unique in creating this type of (innovative) value when walls have been put up around resources by capitalism that other nonmarket production can’t get around.
I’ll have to buy Matt’s book, it’s possible he skips over this for the talk, but goes into it in the book. He does make a very, very good argument for the necessity of piracy - every day, just by forwarding emails we haven’t written, etc, etc, just going about our daily lives, we (apparently) infringe intellectual property to the tune of $12million. A day. If that’s the average, I’m probably way, way over. The copyright laws we have today are completely inadequate for the information age. Creative Commons should be STANDARD. I’ve also been closely following TipJoy (and other innovative forms of micropayment) for some time now.
Related:
- Nine Inch Nails: distribution by pirate
- The music world is abuzz with chatter about the latest Nine Inch Nails LP being released (in part - Volume 1 of 4) on a Creative Commons license! Reznor and co. put it on filesharing sites and are encouraging people to email it to friends, post it on blogs, spread it around far and wide, in the hope that it inspires people to buy the full album. As an aside, I reckon few people are realising the significance and importance of the inclusion of a multi-page PDF with the nine DRM-free tracks. I was interested in what sort of response NIN would get out of music pirates that the music industry hates so much. I had a look at the forums attached to the album's download page on an unspecified music filesharing community. This is the download page for the full 4 volumes, so these people are explicitly going against Reznor's wishes and downloading/sharing all of his new work, illegally. Admittedly, there's a vast amount of bias to people's motivations to append messages to these filesharing pages (and just 43 comments for 1,300 downloads), so this isn't a scientific approach by any means - but the response is very, very...
- Howard Rheingold at TED
- Howard Rheingold's 2005 talk at TED (an event which I'm a massive fan of) has just been posted over at www.ted.com In it, he talks about collaboration, game theory, where current society has got it wrong and where it's headed, arguing that more symbiotic, collaborative, (bottom up?) organisations and forms of commerce and living are the way forward, are actually quite natural (despite what a superficial look at human behaviour in game theory experiments like the Prisoner's Dilemma. Open source, Benkler's theory of nonmarket production, peer to peer, crowd-sourcing, are all concepts that feature heavily in the 20min talk. A must-watch. Well done HR for doing the talk with humour and passion in just 20 minutes despite how large and deep a topic this is. Talking about where society's heading - not easy to put into a nutshell if you want to really do it justice! del.icio.us Tags: p2p,smart mobs,howard rheingold,opensource,collaboration,bottom-up...
- Milk: buy it on Amazon
- Some fantastic reviews of the gallon of milk available on Amazon.com - don't drink said fluid as you read these, it might fly out of your nose In other news, I like this song. del.icio.us Tags: mp3,music,random,e-commerce,Amazon...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Add New Comment
Viewing 1 Comment
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)