Matt Mason, The Pirate’s Dilemma
In the video above, Matt Mason explains the value of piracy to a bunch of trad media suits. He credits pirate radio as a crucible for new music trends and as breaking grounds for new music DJs - an important counterpoint to commercial radio stations like Kiss 100 and Capital FM (in London). I don’t disagree with Matt about the importance of pirate radio. Kiss was once a pirate radio station. But he misses the point - innovation isn’t an inherent property of music piracy. Case in point - new bands aspire for airplay on (BBC) Radio 1, not your local pirate radio - because Radio 1 launches talent, not piracy.
Matt gives piracy too much credit, missing the broader force that piracy is a part of - nonmarket production. Like pirate radio, BBC Radio 1 isn’t market-motivated. THAT’S why it can take risks on underground talent, new music forms (future trends, or not - they don’t care). Publicly-owned services, the pirate underground, nonprofits and transient crowd ‘flashmob’ initiatives are not driven by the same motivations as Kiss and Capital - and that’s where the benefit to society lies. Matt’s defence of piracy is flawed in that it speaks of piracy as a unique mode of creativity and innovation; it isn’t, he’s just chosen to ignore the wider context it lies in. I think he does realise this, lumping Linux etc in with piracy. In which case, it’s disingenuous to fly the Skull & Crossbones; it’s only going to tarnish the reputation of legit nonmarket forms of production.
But he’s spot on with his other points - piracy creates value in society by highlighting that something’s not right with your business model. Piracy keeps you on your toes (forcing you to seek out increased efficiency).
I think Matt’s first argument needs to be adjusted. Piracy supplies you with new ideas BUT only moreso than other forms of nonmarket production when the raw materials HAVE to be ripped off, usually because they’re commercial goods that are overpriced & unaffordable for the public sector, mobs or nonprofit orgs. Hence mp3 blogs operated illegally (before their marketing value was realised by capitalism) because only label (copyrightedO) music was available and in demand by Googlers. Now, mp3 blogs are a major new media marketing channel for labels. Piracy is only unique in creating this type of (innovative) value when walls have been put up around resources by capitalism that other nonmarket production can’t get around.
I’ll have to buy Matt’s book, it’s possible he skips over this for the talk, but goes into it in the book. He does make a very, very good argument for the necessity of piracy - every day, just by forwarding emails we haven’t written, etc, etc, just going about our daily lives, we (apparently) infringe intellectual property to the tune of $12million. A day. If that’s the average, I’m probably way, way over. The copyright laws we have today are completely inadequate for the information age. Creative Commons should be STANDARD. I’ve also been closely following TipJoy (and other innovative forms of micropayment) for some time now.
Related:
- Nine Inch Nails: distribution by pirate
- The music world is abuzz with chatter about the latest Nine Inch Nails LP being released (in part - Volume 1 of 4) on a Creative Commons license! Reznor and co. put it on filesharing sites and are encouraging people to email it to friends, post it on blogs, spread it around far and wide, in the hope that it inspires people to buy the full album. As an aside, I reckon few people are realising the significance and importance of the inclusion of a multi-page PDF with the nine DRM-free tracks. I was interested in what sort of response NIN would get out of music pirates that the music industry hates so much. I had a look at the forums attached to the album’s download page on an unspecified music filesharing community. This is the download page for the full 4 volumes, so these people are explicitly going against Reznor’s wishes and downloading/sharing all of his new work, illegally. Admittedly, there’s a vast amount of bias to people’s motivations to append messages to these filesharing pages (and just 43 comments for 1,300 downloads), so this isn’t a scientific approach by any means - but the response is very, very...
- The birth of the newspaper
- Marc Andreessen has kicked off with a bang a series of historical insights into the tumultuous, unsteady births of the different forms of media we experience today; he starts with one that, ironically, appears to be on its way out: the invention of the newspaper. It's kickass, truly. I wish more blogs in my feed reader were like this, occasional high quality posts, not an echo chamber coverage of 'new media' news....
- EXTEND music copyright?? What is the European Commission smoking?
- News comes via ArsTechnica that the EU may be prepping a move to shift copyright protection up from the standard 50 years to a whopping 95 years. Why 95? Psychologically easier to stomach than a nice, round HUGE number like 100? We’re seeing an incredible rebirth of the creative commons in society, an explosion in DIY creativity, often by people whose inspiration is not the basic act of creation but delivering incredible mashups and remixes. Why then seek to stifle this with even heavier copyright restrictions? Perhaps it’s a double bluff - make copyright even more onerous so that creators instead start looking at copyleft principles (espoused by Creative Commons, which I ardently support). There’s no evidence that extending copyright would patch up our ailing music industry, which is currently going through very well-publicised hard times at the moment. Their problem is people who flaunt copyright - I dare say they’re more concerned about the next Arctic Monkeys album being pirated, than musicians in their old age not getting royalties from songs they performed ab initio or just covered over half a century ago (songwriters, meanwhile, are protected for life+70). Intellectual property is not ostensibly about fairness, it’s about putting...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Add New Comment
Viewing 1 Comment
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)