Oxford University launches 2008 venture capital fund for own students
Oxford’s business school, the Said Business School, has Venture Capitalist ambitions. It has put together a £1m seed stage venture capital fund, the SBSVF, and is looking to invest in businesses launched by members of the biz school itself, or members of the Oxford Entrepreneurs (OE) network. They’re looking to put in £50k to £100,000 to early stage ventures.
They did something similar in 2007, and ended up investing in Jambase, a frankly underwhelming live music portal (recommending and reviewing concerts, with none of the elegance or simplicity of the excellent Songkick) after reviewing over eighty applications. The copyright notice on the Jambase site states that its been around in 1998, so I’m not really sure how that would classify it as a seed stage startup.
The money for the fund has been put up by Sir Philip Green and David Bonderman. Philip Green is a giant of the retail space, notably famous for catalysing the turnaround at Marks & Spencers. David Bonderman is a venture capitalist who found the Texas Pacific Group private eq firm.
Interestingly, and somewhat fittingly, SBS students are involved in vetting, reviewing and doing due diligence on applicants to the SBSVF. This somewhat betrays its perhaps weak money making ambitions and VC credential, but on the other hand it’s nice to see a ‘double bottom line’ (ROI and education). No real evidence of them providing you with the other inputs founders often look for from a seed stage investor - mentorship, contacts with Series A-capable VCs, etc.
EDIT: many thanks to the ever watchful adamski, who points out below that his increased chocolate consumption is in fact responsible for the M&S turnaround, not Philip Green, who I seem to have swapsied with Stuart Rose. Balls.
Related:
- Oxford Geek Nights 5
- Should have practiced my talk! Then maybe I would have realised it wasn't even close to being under 5 minutes. Video and slides on the OGN page. Despite the talk being a disaster, it was, from an objective standpoint, successful: I'm getting somewhere with my public speaking jitters, and lots of people came up later to talk about it. I met some really interesting people and heard some great talks. Conversations of note: Stelios Koundoros, founder at Optimor Systems, trying to bring rationality to consumerism with a recommendation system with some interesting maths under the hood. Some interesting standpoints, some refreshingly Internet-sceptic - probably the only ones in the room! Main thrust of his argument was the shallowness and poverty of online interaction versus face to face life. Also disagrees with me about the value of philanthropy where the funder is not also the executor. David Langer, heroic young web entrepreneur fresh out of Oxford, now busy making Groupspaces.com an invaluable social tool for us all! Great tips and stories for someone such as myself looking to follow in his footsteps! Was one apex of a short but interesting triangular debate between he, James Turnbull and yours truly about the...
- Steve Rura - buff!
- Technorati Tags: design,art Take a look at Steve Rura's work - it's stunningly good. Simple, smooth, beautiful. (via KN) ...
- What does a ‘Forward’ email button do to society?
- "Confused of Calcutta" asks: What happens if I didn’t have a cc button, a bcc button, a Forward button? What happens if I didn’t have “attach document, attach spreadsheet, attach presentation” buttons? What happens if I did have “attach link, attach video, attach audio” buttons, much like Facebook? These features all arose from a very obvious demand/need, so perhaps it's pedantry to ask "what if". But as a thought exercise, these are outstandingly incisive questions pertaining to the nature of 21st-century comms - with huge ramifications. What would be the implications for collaboration (work, organising your social life), cross-fertilisation of ideas, intelligence and mastery of concepts and finding the words to express them, if email had never had a Forward button? What is 'attach video' or 'attach link' doing to our culture and our media (viral media springs to mind, but what are the deeper ramifications)? What about communication, decision making and innovation in the workplace (by forwarding, do we encourage groupthink)? And although these very obvious features to introduce, what isn't so obvious is when to exclude them. JP (confused of calcutta) makes the salient point that actually, on the daddy of all social networks, Facebook, there ISN'T a...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Add New Comment
Viewing 1 Comment
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)