Over The Counter Culture

Staring at the sun
Latest Posts »
Popular »
» Heating your home with a wood-fired boiler
» Lambeth Council to spin out services as co-ops
» The co-op
» On the Happiness of the Fat and the Bereaved
» Adam Curtis Greencine interview on media elitism, the US and the UK
» Last.fm is becoming a great big clever iTunes in the sky
» Open conversation online pays off
» Arsenal FC transfer budget to be cut ‘because of property market slowdown’
« iPlayer; licence fee subsidies
Twitter change »

Seesmic buys a Twitter client: a big step for desktop micro-broadcasting

  So, overhyped social tool Seesmic has acquired the popular Twitter client, Twhirl. Desktop clients, have been an important part of its success, it’s far less compelling to load up Twitter.com all the time.

Oh noes, twittr is advurtisin anudder clientI hope Seesmic didn’t pay much for Twirl: only so much as it would cost them to develop it in house, and not a cent more. Mainly that’s because there are loads of Twitter clients out there, many very good, and the barriers to switching are largely nonexistent – in fact, alternative clients are advertised right within Twhirl (see right >>), powerful advertising since it’s an implicit recommendation from your contacts. At least they get a good Adobe AIR coder, and some cross-selling opportunities to Twhirl users.

Media for a long time pre-Internet was consolidated in the hands of huge, singular broadcasters like the BBC, TimeWarner, newspapers, radio stations. Now, members of the public can broadcast themselves  (I won’t pass judgement here as to whether that’s particularly valuable to society… the techno-utopian says yes, the techno-cynic says no)

When I post short blocks of text to Twitter, short posts on my blog, a quick video to YouTube, etc, I’m broadcasting myself in micro-format compared to the 30 minute format standard TV broadcast. This is being done from my very own desktop (including browser, mobile, playstation, etc), not in a professional studio/newsroom. This studio-> desktop transition is the same seismic shift as that seen in  digital graphics and typesetting during the 80s and 90s). What I suspect motivates Seesmic’s M+A is this: just like Adobe, Corel et al got big on the back of a desktop revolution in publishing, Seesmic feels it can capitalise on the desktop (micro-)broadcasting revolution by building a unified program that people can use as a gateway to broadcasting themselves to various places on the web.

Prediction: 2008/2009 is going to witness many surprise moves in the micro-broadcasting space. Here are some wild guesses to spark your imagination:

  1. Google could use its YouTube brand to move into media services. If it can face the staggering bandwidth requirements, it could expand beyond video. People already use it to publish their mp3s without a video (with just a static photo e.g. here). This means it becomes a media/publisher services platform (just like Amazon is transforming into a retail services firm; you can use its warehouses, its website, its servers, and soon, its financial IT). Google will seek ways, likely via YouTube, to host or aggregate micro-broadcasting. Perhaps with a purchase of Friendfeed.
  2. Microsoft Live! will release a unified desktop micro-broadcasting program that lets you microblog (140-character text message) or microvlog (short video blog) and upload it to Twitter or Seesmic respectively (and others of course; ideally they want you to use Microsoft Live). Might also include tools to make your own podcasts.
  3. Your turn: Facebook will…

Also, what are the odds on Microsoft buying Skype? Stranger things have happened.

Technorati Tags: microbroadcasting,videoblogging,media,broadcasting,Internet,Twitter,Seesmic
Bookmark/Share:

Related:

TED assembly
How I wish that instead of dull sermons from the chaplain or stern slobbers from the headmaster, assembly at school had been a TED video (or better yet, a live speaker of that caliber). What a way to start the day. Here’s a particularly interesting one I just watched, prompting further reading and me seeking to reconnect [...]...
The Chinese, by any other name…
We were surprised to learn, during our month in China, that many bright young things there have a Western name as well as their given Chinese name. They ran the gamut – obvious ones (Zhu Li > Julie), action heroes (Bruce…), to amusingly random (names that would befit a 50’s Holywood starlet, not a trendy [...]...
The weekend’s almost here, so here’s 5 minutes of gleeful madness
Sound is essential. Enjoy. It’s taken from a 2001 (very musical) madcap scifi film (The American Astronaut) from the Sundance film festival that, as one commenter to the Youtube thread puts it, is “so utterly, almost unfathomably cool”. Oh my christ. I quoted a youtube commenter, without any note of mockery or sarcasm ...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

This entry was posted on Friday, April 4th, 2008 at 11:42 am and is filed under Musings. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  • awilensky
    It's easy to say that the acquiring costs for the twhirl client should not have been more than the nominal development costs for an identical AIR client, but I beg to differ - there should be an offset. One reason, really, is that the developer, Frederick, was an early adopter of AIR, and predictably fought through many of the teething issues of AIR's memory leaks. We can argue the size of the offset, but in the end, he delivered a superior handling client, and gained some critical experience in an immature platform - taking that in-house (they hired him, as well, I gather) is not trivial.
  • Philippe Bradley
    On the one hand, I agree with you - as I said, they get a get what is probably a good inhouse AIR developer (though they could probably have hired him without buying his existing projects, so that can't be the only motivation).

    But then again, as I said, there are plenty of alternative Twitter clients, including AIR ones, that are equally as good, if not better. Just as people assume Twurl is a better client because everyone uses it, being first on scene does not make something inherently better. Credit to him for being an early-early adopter, and coding through a beta phase of a framework; that's proof that he's not a *bad* coder - but it's not evidence that he's logically any better than what's out there at the moment
blog comments powered by Disqus
  • Home
  • About
  • List all posts
  • Current Reading
  • Search

Over The Counter Culture is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).