Over The Counter Culture

Staring at the sun
Latest Posts »
Popular »
» Beijing/Shanghai
» A-nyhao!
» India on the road - Part 2
» India - a summary
» Google Friend Connect - part 2: The largest Social Network ever built
» Social networking dividend of open conversations
» Conversation platforms will make blogs redundant
» Arsenal FC transfer budget to be cut ‘because of property market slowdown’
« The semantic elephant in the room - Google will settle the "top down vs. bottom up" debate for us
Men’s Fear, for GQ Magazine Russia »

Should new media actually try to compete with piracy?

image Spoke to some interesting people at the ContentNext mixer earlier tonight. Of particular interest were some guys from the film distribution industry, not just because it’s something I did some strategy work on in 2007, but because these are the guys (LOVEFiLM et al) that are really suffering from media piracy, no matter what they do (despite this, Amazon is reportedly taking a very strong interest in the aforementioned company).

They’re stuck between pirates who refuse to pay for content, and film studios (publishers) that are used to scarcity selling (shifting low units relative to what could potentially be achieved with the Internet as a distribution network, at high margins) and refuse to drop wholesale prices to LOVEFiLM etc.

The emergent call from the anti-RIAA crowd (Andrew Orlowski of The Register calls them, or us rather, “freetards“) is ‘don’t punish, compete!’

But a moment’s reflection suggests that that may be a fool’s errand. Firstly, how on earth do you compete with the following:

  1. Free!
  2. Huge catalogs of content on demand - every rarity
  3. Available in the format you want (or the open source/freeware tools to convert it) - e.g. losssless audio (FLAC)
  4. Leaked content available before it hits cinemas or stores (allowing you to show off in front of mates, and to respond immediately to the strong urges to see a film induced by their prerelease marketing - scratching the itch without having to be patient)
  5. Content from different geographies, e.g. hit US TV shows
  6. DRM restriction-free - take it anywhere, use it uninhibited exactly as you desire
  7. No pesky advertising - we universally HATE advertising, from billboard defacers to DVR/Tivo fast-forwarders
  8. No transaction hassle - click and download. Never have to take your credit card out of your pocket
  9. Services run by volunteers - tiny running costs, no capex; totally scalable distributed, p2p infrastructure

Honestly. How the hell do you build a viable business capable of competing?

And yet, many people today do the supposedly irrational thing and never actually learn piracy. Once you know how to use bittorrent, you’re unlikely to use LOVEFiLM. But my sisters use it, as they’ve never used bittorrent.

Basically, it’s a cultural thing. The difference 2 years (me vs. my sister) makes: my age cohort (people currently in their 20-30s; the Napster generation) just didn’t have access to content on demand - apart from piracy. Piracy was literally the only way to go for on demand media - there was no alternative! Piracy became part of our cultural habits. You learnt the sites, you adopted the attitude, you got used to the luxuries listed above. But that’s all changed, and unlike me my sister sees LOVEFiLM and the iTunes Music Store as natural sources for ondemand content, not the pirate sites/tools I have become intimate with over the years. Legal services have the benefit of mass marketing (you can’t exactly advertise torrent sites!) so get there first, establish themselves as the natural sources.

The difference between then and now boils down to this: before, EVERYONE was driven into piracy. Now, only the really price-sensitive are driven into piracy. And as we’re often told, this is the first post-scarcity (post war, post baby boom) generation. We have more disposable income than ever before. Check out the price of cinema popcorn or a pair of jeans. The fact is, not many of us are actually so price sensitive as to deliberately avoid iTunes/LOVEFiLM. So LOVEFiLM doesn’t need to directly compete with piracy - it was too late to the scene and it’s lost my age band (we’re too used to the luxury of piracy), but my sister and younger will be the key market constituent and won’t be nearly as piracy-native as we have been. Only total cheapskates and the old Napster/Kazaa ‘freetard’ generation will remain in torrent communities.

So when talking to them, I advised patience, not competition with piracy - they might end up cutting their own wrists to please the unpleasable freetard generation, and end up with rock bottom prices by the time the teens of today hit the market. Music labels were too hasty to jump into iTunes and they killed the album, and thus £9 of revenue per transaction (I exaggerate). Ad-supported high-quality content should be a LAST resort; if by 2012 the market still isn’t paying up front for content, that’s when you use it. For now, clench your arsecheeks - I realise 4 years can be a long time to wait when you’re starving.

I’m currently running an ad hoc survey of torrent site users and their spending on music (I’m a nerd like that). I’m kicking myself that I didn’t ask for their age, too. But if I make this an annual/6 month thing I might see the increasing proportion of cheapskates/reduced ASPU that I predict.

del.icio.us Tags: piracy,music business models,new media,distribution
Bookmark/Share:

Related:

Virgin Media anti-piracy: who’s the crook now, eh?!
Virgin Media is looking to emulate the 'French model' of anti-piracy, big-label protective measures, which sees persistent (three strikes) offenders warned and then kicked off the network. This is old hat stuff but a complex issue. In the post below I make the case that society needs to be wary/cynical towards this announcement - moreso than our castrate mainstream media. Here's why: Firstly, I take issue with the deliberately misleading, but unfortunately mainstream, assumption that music pirates are costing the music industry (as opposed to major music labels) serious amounts of cash. Many (not all!) music pirates spend vast amounts of money on music - you can see the results of my ad hoc study as they come in, here and here. These pirates just don't spend it on the big releases from major labels, mainly because having access to vast (shared) libraries of music means you can find the obscure records you REALLY like. They also spend a lot of money on concerts, merchandise, and within specialist distribution platforms that big labels have yet to get into bed with, like eMusic. An argument could be made that the iPod and the iTunes Music Store have destroyed just as much...
Revolution over at EvokeONE
Fascinating virtual art exhibition loosely based around the theme of revolution (there are many others including Fable, Calligraphy, Muse, etc) featuring digital design art, music and photography - really, really high quality stuff. Love the music too, unexpectedly! I'll be returning frequently to Evokeone.com if they can keep this up. del.icio.us Tags: design,art,photography,music...
Nine Inch Nails: distribution by pirate
The music world is abuzz with chatter about the latest Nine Inch Nails LP being released (in part - Volume 1 of 4) on a Creative Commons license! Reznor and co. put it on filesharing sites and are encouraging people to email it to friends, post it on blogs, spread it around far and wide, in the hope that it inspires people to buy the full album. As an aside, I reckon few people are realising the significance and importance of the inclusion of a multi-page PDF with the nine DRM-free tracks. I was interested in what sort of response NIN would get out of music pirates that the music industry hates so much. I had a look at the forums attached to the album's download page on an unspecified music filesharing community. This is the download page for the full 4 volumes, so these people are explicitly going against Reznor's wishes and downloading/sharing all of his new work, illegally. Admittedly, there's a vast amount of bias to people's motivations to append messages to these filesharing pages (and just 43 comments for 1,300 downloads), so this isn't a scientific approach by any means - but the response is very, very...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

This entry was posted on Friday, March 28th, 2008 at 1:41 am and is filed under Musings. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

discussion by DISQUS

Add New Comment

  • Subscribe:  This Thread
  • Go to:  My Comments ·  Community Page
  • Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.

    Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

     
    discussion by DISQUS

    Add New Comment

    Trackbacks

    (Trackback URL)

    close ()

    status via twitter

    recent comments (follow comments)

      View Profile »
      Powered by Disqus · Learn more
      close Reblog this comment
      Powered by Disqus · Learn more
      blog comments powered by Disqus
      • Home
      • About
      • List all posts
      • Current Reading
      • Categories
        • Culture bucket
        • Lifestream
        • Musings
        • New science
      • Search

      Over The Counter Culture is proudly powered by WordPress
      Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).