Over The Counter Culture

If sunlight is the best disinfectant, the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) is possibly a strongly relevant to good government as is electoral swing sweeping out established parties from power structures to let new blood in, disrupting lobbyist networks, ‘usual channel’ (backchannel) routines, etc.

FOIA is pretty wonderful. It gives you a (qualified) right to drop an email to any public authority, being as snippy as you like (in fact, terseness and clarity are very much encouraged) and they have to bend over backwards (up to 18 man hours’ worth) to get you an answer.

The problem is that ‘public authority’ is defined even more narrowly in FOIA than it is for other ‘good government’ citizens’ tools, like the Human Rights Act (which gives you rights against interference by public authorities) or judicial review (whereby any unfair or improper decision taken by a public authority can be put through the courts which can order that it should be ‘done right’, and fairly). In FOIA, public authorities are either the ones listed in Schedule 1 to the Act, or designated as such by the Secretary of State (i.e. by the government). The buck, seemingly, stops there. You can’t get anywhere with a FOIA request to any government contractors, like many care homes for example, or ex-national utilities, now privatised (e.g. Network Rail, BT, etc), or bodies charged with ‘self regulating’ and industry.

Or can’t you. This post is effectively a bleg: I would love to know from someone with experience with FOIA, whether the following hypothesis has any legal merit. I wonder whether you could probably construe s3(2)(b) as catching any information gathered (and thus now held) under delegated powers. It reads:

s3: Public authorities

(1)In this Act “public authority” means—

   (a)subject to section 4(4), any body which, any other person who, or the holder of any office which—

      (i)is listed in Schedule 1, or

      (ii)is designated by order under section 5, or

   (b)a publicly-owned company as defined by section 6.

(2)For the purposes of this Act, information is held by a public authority if—

   (a)it is held by the authority, otherwise than on behalf of another person, or

   (b)it is held by another person on behalf of the authority.

I would love to be able to slap a FOIA on government contractors or pseudo-governmental regulatory bodies. How good would it be to FOIA the Press Complaints Commission for emails, reports, the lot… we could disinfect the single biggest influence in modern British politics and society, the popular press!

Mice and rats infected with toxoplasmosis are less scared of cats and can even start ‘deliberately’ hanging around areas where they can smell cats. Inevitably, that means they’ll get eaten, the cat will get the disease, and will help spread it around.

In humans, there is some evidence that toxoplasmosis is linked to schizophrenia.

Most amazingly, in women who get toxoplasmosis, the likelihood of a boy being born goes from slightly over 50% potentially all the way up to 72% – so for every 10 girls, 26 boys would be born.

If you have a specific blood type (Rh-), you’re 2.5 times more likely to have a car accident than uninfected people.

There’s controversial evidence that men become more anti-social, grumpy, risky/rebellious, but less curious – and that women become friendlier, keener to have sex, more outgoing, and might be considered more attractive by men.

In most healthy human beings, toxoplasmosis merely presents with flu-like symptoms, then sits dormant.

source

The co-op ‘went green’ a little while ago by installing boilers fuelled by little pellets of compressed sawdust. Until recently we had to load them by hand, each house regularly lugging 10kg bags of pellets from the car park into the big ‘feeder’ receptacles for the boilers. This now gets done by truck, thankfully cutting down on manual labour and the volume of plastic bags left lying around. Take a look:

I haven’t seen the numbers on what this costs or what the carbon footprint is like, but I assume they’re both pretty low; the boilers however seem to have required quite a few maintenance calls over the winter; they’re largely untested modifications to an Italian design, and have been used quite heavily over these cold winters. Naturally, every house has a backup electric immersion heater.

Life in the coop continues apace. So a misleadingly-titled article on the BBC last Thursday caught my eye. Like most of London, Lambeth Borough Council (which runs Waterloo) is facing really serious budget cuts (around 20% reduction in central gov’t funding). Services will get cut – £30m pounds’ worth (that may sound a lot, but works out as about £111/resident).

We’ve already heard that Barnet is doing a Ryanair – you want your council to work for you (or just to put you to the front of the line on stuff like planning applications) – you pay them for it (in addition to council tax, of course).

Lambeth’s approach is to spin out services as co-ops. Note that this isn’t privatisation – a co-operative is owned, run by and run for the very same people. Retail giant John Lewis (also owns Waitrose) gives partner status in the business to all 69,000 permanent employees, who run the company and take the profits.

So according to the council, they are “proposing an alternative where [the Council] can give people the tools to do the job or mutualising where [the Council] can set up something and then hand it over to the people who will use it, to run it.”

They like to highlight housing as a prime example – Lambeth already has more tenant-run estates than any other London borough.

"We have been doing this for three or four years. We have experience of it. What has happened, as a result of recession we are putting it together to help save costs, keep services and give something to the community."

The company that runs Lambeth’s leisure centres is a co-op, owned by its employees.

They also float the idea of turning some schools into mutualised private co-ops – the idea of a teacher-run school is intriguing; to what extent would parents also get a say? Lambeth is trialling a ‘Parent-Promoted Foundation School’ (link to Lambeth mag) where “local parents with support from the council took the lead in setting the school up, appointing the head teacher, choosing the design, and deciding what the school would be like”. It’s the first in the country, and took 6 years to set up. The general Secretary of the National Union of Teachers has come out guns blazing against any experimentation:

“It is simply not right that public money should be given to a group of enthusiastic amateurs, motivated by what they want for their own children.”

“If they think there are issues with the schools, there is a number of ways to suggest changes through the existing structure.”